Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Is sharing really caring?
#PureXmasAdWatch update
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f72/77f72af8cfa5651a3168cf2aa3b20560b6895bce" alt=""
This year, more than ever before, social media is at the vanguard of the Christmas ad battle, where people are sharing their thoughts and interacting as a result of exposure to the traditional advertising. It's not just a battle of the big TV ads, it's more a battle of the #hashtags and ongoing opt-in engagement levels.
There are plenty of numbers that advertisers will use to try and demonstrate their social superiority -from Twitter mentions, Facebook launch post interactions, #hashtags, YouTube views, Google+'s to number of 'Likes' to name but a few, so we at Pure thought we'd take a look at how the campaigns that launched earlier this month are being run and indeed what results can show to date.
In our view, John Lewis has (again!) come out well on top. The crux of the argument behind this assertion is that as an advertiser we would rather have consumers consuming (i.e. watching) our ad rather than just talking about it.
Numbers such as Twitter mentions, #hashtag shares, Facebook interactions, etc. are useful data and indeed seem to suggest that there's quite a tight race going on with regards to interaction and engagement in this busy market. However, John Lewis launched their ad on YouTube 24 hours before it went 'live' on TV and it's on that platform that they have buried the others under an avalanche of views:
YouTube views
(as at 20th Nov):
John Lewis - 7.8 million
M&S - 770k
Argos - 630k
Sainsbury's - 355k
Tesco - 320k
What's more, they have predominantly achieved their exposure through organic seeding, unlike M&S who appear to have been forced to try and combat JL's dominance by spending heavily on paid-for search. When looking at the John Lewis social campaign in its entirety, you can see that there is an excellent co-ordination of the composite parts - they all work individually but also support and enhance the others.
For example, the ad launch was coupled with a pre-emptive teaser Twitter #hashtag of #sleepingbear followed by #bearandhare as soon as it went live. On that first weekend, the John Lewis Twitter audience grew by 10% (4,000 new followers).
In contrast, Marks and Spencer have had approx. 4,000 mentions of #magicandsparkle and unforgivably, Tesco launched their ad on Twitter but failed to attach a specific hashtag, thereby surely losing both campaign theme and indeed trackability of popularity.
It's interesting to note that elsewhere, M&S has been quoted as having the most Twitter mentions (c.60million) with Tesco (49 million) and John Lewis lagging behind (45 million).
M&S have also been shown to have the edge on the competition when it comes to Facebook interactions, with 160,000 interactions to their launch post - Asda (87,000), John Lewis (71,000) and Tesco (9,000) are way behind.
Sharing is caring, but in our opinion active engagement and opt-in viewing is a far more effective result.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77f72/77f72af8cfa5651a3168cf2aa3b20560b6895bce" alt=""
This year, more than ever before, social media is at the vanguard of the Christmas ad battle, where people are sharing their thoughts and interacting as a result of exposure to the traditional advertising. It's not just a battle of the big TV ads, it's more a battle of the #hashtags and ongoing opt-in engagement levels.
There are plenty of numbers that advertisers will use to try and demonstrate their social superiority -from Twitter mentions, Facebook launch post interactions, #hashtags, YouTube views, Google+'s to number of 'Likes' to name but a few, so we at Pure thought we'd take a look at how the campaigns that launched earlier this month are being run and indeed what results can show to date.
In our view, John Lewis has (again!) come out well on top. The crux of the argument behind this assertion is that as an advertiser we would rather have consumers consuming (i.e. watching) our ad rather than just talking about it.
Numbers such as Twitter mentions, #hashtag shares, Facebook interactions, etc. are useful data and indeed seem to suggest that there's quite a tight race going on with regards to interaction and engagement in this busy market. However, John Lewis launched their ad on YouTube 24 hours before it went 'live' on TV and it's on that platform that they have buried the others under an avalanche of views:
YouTube views
(as at 20th Nov):
John Lewis - 7.8 million
M&S - 770k
Argos - 630k
Sainsbury's - 355k
Tesco - 320k
What's more, they have predominantly achieved their exposure through organic seeding, unlike M&S who appear to have been forced to try and combat JL's dominance by spending heavily on paid-for search. When looking at the John Lewis social campaign in its entirety, you can see that there is an excellent co-ordination of the composite parts - they all work individually but also support and enhance the others.
For example, the ad launch was coupled with a pre-emptive teaser Twitter #hashtag of #sleepingbear followed by #bearandhare as soon as it went live. On that first weekend, the John Lewis Twitter audience grew by 10% (4,000 new followers).
In contrast, Marks and Spencer have had approx. 4,000 mentions of #magicandsparkle and unforgivably, Tesco launched their ad on Twitter but failed to attach a specific hashtag, thereby surely losing both campaign theme and indeed trackability of popularity.
It's interesting to note that elsewhere, M&S has been quoted as having the most Twitter mentions (c.60million) with Tesco (49 million) and John Lewis lagging behind (45 million).
M&S have also been shown to have the edge on the competition when it comes to Facebook interactions, with 160,000 interactions to their launch post - Asda (87,000), John Lewis (71,000) and Tesco (9,000) are way behind.
Sharing is caring, but in our opinion active engagement and opt-in viewing is a far more effective result.
Labels:
#bearandhare,
#PureAdOfTheWeek,
#PurePoint,
#PureXmasAdWatch,
Christmas,
Christmas 2013,
Christmas ads,
Christmas in a Day,
John Lewis,
M&S,
Marks and Spencer,
TV Ad
Monday, November 18, 2013
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas...
Pretty much all the (Christmas) cards are on the table, so over the next few weeks, we’ll
be giving our comment and feedback on the efforts of some of the nation’s biggest
retailers' Christmas advertising - remember it’s our thoughts that count ;)
#PureXmasAdWatch
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6fa0/c6fa05e98a6507268847ee7b9142e8d1be3d10bc" alt=""
John Lewis’ bear is out of the
cave to huge social and media acclaim. The #bearandhare ad has already amassed over 6.8 Million views on YouTube in just over 7 days.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9533e/9533e1c49ea5d3b74ad94b595a5678731e447314" alt=""
M&S now stands for ‘Magic and Sparkle’ (apparently) and Sainsbury’s has wrapped Christmas Day up into a 3 and a half minute tearjerker.
Once we’ve digested these chunky ads, there’s Tesco, Boots, Morrisons, Debenham's, ASDA, Waitrose and plenty of others to get through….by which time we are well and truly stuffed like the proverbial turkey.
These big budget Xmas ads appear to have become the UK equivalent of the
Superbowl advertising in America - and whilst incomparable in cost to the coveted Superbowl final ad break, one thing for certain is that the costs of the TV
ads will be at an all-time high in the UK when considering the premium space. As announced
recently, the X Factor final ad breaks will cost £200,000 per 30 seconds. This
could net ITV somewhere in the region of £16 million. A nice present for their
shareholders.
We will focus on the way
advertisers are using press and the social media world in more depth in future
blogs, but at this stage we are concentrating on TV, and rather than take the
traditional powerhouse John Lewis as our primary candidate, we’re kicking off by
taking a look at Sainsbury’s attempt at shaking things up slightly by promoting their TV ad as a
film.
The ‘Taste the Difference’
brand waited until after the others had pulled their TV crackers and then started to promote the first airing of the ad in the press by directing
newspaper readers to tune in and watch the ad.
The full film is reminiscent of Tinsel Town - 45 minutes long and due to have a premier as well as a
release-date on YouTube. The campaign was launched in a 3 ½ minute trailer during
Coronation Street. The length and exceptional nature of this media
execution should ensure that it becomes a vanguard aspect of their campaign.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/152f5/152f51fcfa72b4e50d97dd935f15be124307f094" alt=""
M&S has a 150 second fantasy-story mash-up and the story-telling of John Lewis lasts a beefy 2 minutes but both pale in
comparison to the size of this ad-break behemoth. Whether it proves a success is
yet to be determined, as the multimedia element required for a successful
Christmas campaign is becoming more important than ever before.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03951/0395121024a486a8ad88bf6dc05048b129624d63" alt=""
It’s interesting how so many advertisers are choosing to focus on our emotions (trust, love,
desire, greed, etc) as much as they are the cost or reliability in order to sell. ‘Value vs Values’ is a
theme to keep an eye on as we head into the season of goodwill.
Labels:
#bearandhare,
#PurePoint,
#PureXmasAdWatch,
Asda,
Christmas,
Christmas 2013,
Christmas ads,
Christmas in a Day,
John Lewis,
M&S,
Magic and Sparkle,
Marks and Spencer,
Pure Media,
Sainsbury's,
Xmas,
Xmas ads
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)